Lucid AI + MCP: Help us build the future 🚀

This is me interacting with Kiro in this case while trying to build an ASCII version of an architectural diagram:

in the archtiecture diagram in section 1.1, the react frontend component should interact with the API GW only.  It doesn't go direct to the Query Engine.  We need to add another layer between the [step funtions, elasticache, query engine] layer and the [users, React Frontend UI, API GW] layer.  This should have the [aws cognito] component in it.  The query engine should then be connected to the [aws cognito] component and to the [api gw] component.  The bottom layer should be ordered as [users, React Frontend UI, API GW] since the [users] interact with the [react frontend ui] which interacts with the [api gw].

This is the sort of conversation I want to have to build Lucid charts via a MCP rather than build them in ASCII

Just came across this thread. ​@cesar m - Any thoughts about the ETA of an official Lucid MCP server release, or should I just ask Claude to roll our own?

​@AJ Van Beest — I don’t have a public date to share yet, but our goal is to get an early version into customers’ hands as soon as possible this year.

We’ll share more details here as soon as we have a timeline.

Thanks again to everyone who’s shared ideas and use cases in this thread — your feedback has directly influenced how we’re designing Lucid’s Model Context Protocol (MCP) Server.

We’ve refined our research based on what we heard and built a short follow-up survey focused on real workflows, trust, and value when connecting AI tools to Lucid securely.

👉 Take the updated 7-minute survey — (https://t.maze.co/411108922)

If you’d like to go deeper, the final screen includes an option to schedule a 30-minute chat to share your experience directly with our team.

Your feedback helps us shape how tools like Claude, Copilot, and Gemini will work inside Lucid — securely and intelligently — as we prepare for Beta.

Thanks for continuing to help us build this right.

Hello ​@cesar m, 

I hope everything is going smoothly, I was wondering if the mcp is developed or do we still need to wait for it?

just completed the updated survey. hope my input helps :)

Hi Cesar, 

I was in a Lucid Legends session today, and I think the MCP server should have a name. For example, my credit union has one named Fran, named after the credit union’s first manager long long ago. And of course, there is Grok on X pulling information from all kinds of servers to provide info for users. 
 

MCP Server sounds very machine vs human when they are interacting with each other. It was just a thought. Ben is going to pass it along, too, since I mentioned it in his meeting. It doesn’t have to be named Teresa either. 😉

Teresa Potts

Has anyone created rules for this MCP? I am just getting started and it would be great if someone already has something, I think this would apply to Claud Code and Cursor.