Skip to main content
Idea

Enhancements for the dynamic Jira board

Related products:Lucidspark
  • March 28, 2024
  • 2 replies
  • 30 views

Forum|alt.badge.img

I would like to use the dynamic bidirectional Jira integration to create a dynamic board for me to manage work items held in Jira. 

 

The current implementation is tightly coupled to the Jira issues themselves. I’d like the flexibility to map multiple statuses from jira to a single column in my Lucid board (similar to how I can do this in Jira). In the same way I would want to map multiple attribute values to a single row so all tickets with any one of these values will all appear in the same row.

 

Given: a dynamic jira board in lucid

When: I click on the board

Then: there is an option to configure it

 

Given: that I am configuring a dynamic Jira board

When: I merge two columns (A and B)

Then: all the tickets with status A and those with status B are displayed in a single column (and there is an option for me to name this column)

 

Given: that I am configuring a dynamic Jira board

When: I merge 2 rows (X and Y)

Then: all the all the tickets that were previously shown in row X and those previously shown in row Y are all now shown in a single row (and there is an option for me to name this row)

Comments

Micah
Forum|alt.badge.img+20
  • Lucid community team
  • March 28, 2024

Hi, thanks for this such detailed feedback and an explanation of how you would use this! We encourage anyone else who’s interested in this to upvote this post and share any additional details about your use case or what you’d like to see in this experience. For more information about how we manage feedback in this community, please take a look at this post:

 


Preston H
Forum|alt.badge.img+2
  • Lucid product team
  • April 1, 2024

Thanks for the feedback bransley! I wonder if you could do what you’re describing with custom pivots for the rows and columns of the dynamic table. We don’t support merging cells yet, but I’m curious what your pivots on the row and columns are in this case?

Is it by status and something else?